Skip to main content

RIP: American Idol Was Never About the "Idol"



American Idol, the long-running TV show that took advantage of the insatiable adolescent craving for attention, fame and fortune, has at last been laid to rest. It certainly wasn't the first of its kind. Less ostentatious versions have been around for a long time - even before there were televisions.

What made this iteration different was its breadth and scope - scouring the country for fledgling talent in a tournament-like elimination competition. It was a huge success. Millions watched as thousands responded to auditions in cities all over the country, and some very good performers were actually discovered.

So what's the problem? Simply this - instant fame is rarely a good thing. We see it over and over with teenage athletes who become millionaires overnight, and lottery winners who have no idea how to handle their windfall. The show was promoted as a showcase for undiscovered talent. The producers were cast as benefactors, talent scouts seeking out those who deserve to be noticed, and giving them a chance to become stars. The implication was that the future of the finalists (and maybe one or two others) would be guaranteed. They'd go on to rewarding careers in show business and live happily ever after.

But a moment of reflection brings us back to reality.

The only purpose for the show's existence was to make money. It was that way when the "Amateur Hour" first hit the radio airwaves, and it still is. It always will be that way for commercial-based programing. The format is always secondary. You can bet they would have gladly gone with a hundred guys like William Hung if people watched. Ratings and ad revenue are all that matter.

This takes nothing away from the millions of viewers who tuned in faithfully every week. If it had entertainment value for them, that's great. Just a warning for the contestants and viewers of some similar future show - don't drink the network's Kool-aid.

I wonder how many musicians who achieve greatness through years of struggle and hard work would say they'd have preferred the American Idol way. How many, I don't know. But I gotta believe they have a healthy appreciation for the process they went through, and are respectfully aware that they wouldn't be the artists they became without it.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

George Carlin Explains How the System is Rigged | Video

George Carlin was more than just a comedian - he was an insightful social/political commentator as is demonstrated here. In this monologue from eight years ago, no punches are pulled, no sacred cows are exempt when he reveals the truth about the America we presently live in.
Post a Comment
Read more

The World on a Billionaire's Budget

Originally posted at theconversation.com The world’s wealthiest are prospering. As of February 2017, there were about 2,000 billionaires in the world. This micro-elite controls over US$7.6 trillion, an increase of 18 percent from 2016. A billionaire’s spending power is difficult to grasp, both because most people do not correctly intuit large numbers, and because a billion dollars far outstrips most people’s experience. What does a household budget look like to a billionaire? To find out, let’s scale down a billionaire’s income to $50,000, the median American income, adjusting budget items proportionally. A year in the life of Joe Billionaire To start, we need to estimate a billionaire’s annual income. In the 30 years from 1987 to 2016, Bill and Melinda Gates amassed about $120 billion. This figure represents $80 billion in net worth and $40 billion controlled by their charitable foundation. The Gates’ average annual income for these years is $120 billion divided by 30, or $4 billion. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Slippery Slope of Dehumanizing Language

Roseanne Barr had her sitcom canceled on May 29, after calling former Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett the child of an ape. Richard Shotwell/Invision/AP, File   By  Allison Skinner , Northwestern University Comparing people to animals seems to increasingly be a part of our political discourse. When Roseanne Barr tweeted that former White House senior adviser Valerie Jarrett was the child of an ape , it came only a couple of weeks after Donald Trump called immigrant gang members, “ animals .” Trump has been a target himself: On the cover of its April 2 issue, New York magazine depicted the president as a pig . As a psychologist who studies social attitudes and intergroup relations, I get a bit uneasy when I see these types of insults get normalized. At their core, they’re a way to dehumanize others – a practice that can have pernicious effects. In a range of studies, psychologists have been able to show how dehumanizing messages can ...
Post a Comment
Read more